fbpx

January 21, 2017 1:55 pm

Norman Eng

Read chapter 9 for next week’s class.

Be prepared to discuss the handout tomorrow.

List 3 things you learned from this article and share on the discussion board.

A lot of professors assign readings like these; i.e., students read a piece of text, respond to it in some way and/or come prepared to discuss it in class. Yet over half of students don’t do the assigned readings, and often it’s because professors assign too much. (1, 2)  

Maybe it’s time we stop assigning readings. 

Perhaps we should instead start assigning tasks.

Picture this: You’re teaching about gender inequality. You want students to read a handout on this topic, but you're concerned they won’t read it or that they’ll only do so superficially. Instead of telling students, “Read this handout and write a one-page response,” you might assign the following task:

Research the pay gap between men and women in 3 different industries/jobs. Explain why you think these jobs pay unfair wages. 

Here’s a meaningful task students can focus on, rather than on some handout. But for students to report on unfair wages, they need to read up on the topic, right? That’s where you recommend certain sources:

To help, I’ve provided two handouts and a video. Refer to at least three ideas or supporting details from any of these sources in your write-up.  

See how the readings play a secondary, almost incidental, role? 

This is the case even if the reading comes from a textbook. Let’s say you teach Introduction to Biology, and this week you need to cover chapter 35, titled “Vascular Plant Structure, Growth, and Development.”

You could assign Chapter 35 and hope students read and digest all the terms covered. Or you could focus on one particular area—the structure of leaves and their functions—and turn it into a task/assignment:   

Collect 3-5 different kinds of leaves (yes, actual leaves!) and analyze them. Tape them onto a piece of paper and label as many parts as you can that are visible. The more you’re able to do so, the better. Chapter 35 will help you do this. Come prepared during class to discuss what each part does. 

While there are many (perhaps better) ways to ensure students understand plant structure, the lesson here is the same: don’t make reading the main thing, even though we know it’s a necessary part of the assignment. 

So, why might a task-based approach to reading motivate students more?

Essentially, it mirrors the way we read in real life. Aside from reading for pleasure, we read because we want to get better at something or know more about a topic. Books such as How to Build Your Baby’s Brain, The Self-Driven Child, and Raising Kids Who Read have provided me, for instance, with incredible insights into raising my twin infant girls. Yet I would never read such books if it didn’t support my larger parenting goals. 

Intentional reading also changes the way we read, turning us from a passive reader who “proceeds from the first word to the last word of a text at a rate predictable by the text’s structure, to one of a purposeful information-seeker who adapts the way they read to achieve that purpose.” (3) With my parenting books, I have selectively skipped paragraphs, sections, and even whole chapters that I considered less relevant. Why wouldn’t we expect students to be just as discerning?

A task-based approach can work even for literature classes or courses where students read fiction text. Compare two ways to approach Ralph Ellison’s novel Invisible Man:

Old Way:

Read Chapter 1 and come prepared to discuss the roles that the narrator is forced to play during his class speech. [Here, the reading is the main focus.]

New Way:

Think about the last time you were forced to “play a role” you didn’t necessarily want to play. Post a short paragraph describing this role and why you felt this way. Make sure to include how it compares with and differs from the narrator’s experiences in Chapter 1. [Here, the reading serves the larger task/assignment.]

Of course, reading literature has a generally different purpose than reading nonfiction text; in fact, oftentimes reading here is the goal. Students in a literature circle (which is kind of like a book club for students) or a graduate research class, for example, are analyzing texts for their own sake. 

For most of us, however, readings serve as the “information transfer” phase of learning. 

The next time you plan readings, consider the larger goal you want students to reach, the task you want them to complete, or the skill you want them to develop. Then provide the resource(s) to help them get there. It might include not just readings, but also videos and other primary documents. 

Let’s break down a task-based approach to reading into four steps, each with an example: 

STEP 1: Decide the goal/task AND the readings (ideally, you want to make sure the reading is essential to doing well in the task). 

ObjectiveThis week, I want my education students to be able to teach adding and subtracting with math manipulatives.

ReadingThey will read Chapter 9, “Estimation and Computational Procedures for Whole Numbers.”

STEP 2: Frame the assignment in terms of the goal or task ONLY. Ignore the readings in this step (it will be incorporated in Step 3).

Your goal this week is to figure out the best way to teach addition and subtraction using base-ten blocks. (Add details if necessary.) 

STEP 3: Add the readings as a recommendation (to help students accomplish their task/goal).

Use the strategies from chapter 9 to decide which works best for you and write a 2-paragraph plan.

STEP 4: Tell students how the information will be used (and how they are held accountable).

Next week in class, you will share your plan and decide which ideas work best!

Put together, here is the fleshed-out assignment that students see, packaged around a hypothetical scenario: 

Meet Julissa.

She’s eight years old and in third grade. But she has trouble multiplying two-digit numbers. Conceptually, she knows that multiplying has something to do with groups. Yet the traditional algorithmic way to multiply is too abstract for her. 

How would YOU teach Julissa? Your goal is to figure out the best way to teach multiplication using base-ten blocks. Consider the strategies from chapter 9 and decide which resonates most with you—and which you think would actually help Julissa.

Write a 2-paragraph plan explaining/justifying your instructional choice. Next week in class, you will share your plan and come to a group consensus.

See how I embed the reading without explicitly assigning it? This task would be impossible to do without reading the chapter. No quizzes, “gotcha” questions in class, or reading responses are necessary to compel students to read. 

Just make sure you hold students accountable for doing the assignment. In some cases, the simple act of having them share their thoughts in class is enough. Other times you may decide that the task is worth a certain number of points and/or that students have to post their responses on the online discussion board.  

As you can imagine, it’s not always necessary to use a task-based approach. Some readings, such as an article on how to land a job interview or a chapter about the impact of social media, are inherently purposeful and motivating for students. Using task-based approaches depends on you and your goal. 

Perhaps the real promise of task-based approaches to reading comes when we can stop dictating the sources. Students would be the ones who must figure out what texts to read and what videos to watch. All we have to do is come up with the goals or tasks. That’s when students become true self-directed learners. 

For now, let’s start by positioning reading where it should be—in service to the goals and tasks we assign. This would be a significant step to helping students see reading as useful, rather than as simply something they must do. 

Let me know if this approach to reading helps - leave a comment or question below!

 --------

Sources:

(1) Hoeft, Mary E. (2012) "Why University Students Don't Read: What Professors Can Do To Increase Compliance," International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Vol. 6: No. 2, Article 12. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol6/iss2/12/

(2) Cynthia S. Deale & Seung Hyun (Jenna) Lee (2021) To Read or Not to Read? Exploring the Reading Habits of Hospitality Management Students, Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, DOI: 10.1080/10963758.2020.1868317

(3) Durik, A. M., Britt, M. A., Rouet, J. (2017). Literacy beyond text comprehension: A theory of purposeful reading. United States: Taylor & Francis.

 

“Really? No wonder my classes were so boring!”

That sums up the reactions I get when people hear this.

While faculty salaries make up one-third of college budgets,  almost none of the money actually go into pedagogical training, professional development, or improving instruction.

How much have you had?

If you’re lucky, program heads or department chairs may get faculty together once in while to, for instance, help students write better—a perennial issue. Oftentimes, however, collaborating is up to individual professors. I’ve had the fortune of working with colleagues who teach an education seminar course helping students pass a newer, more rigorous teacher performance assessment.

Those opportunities are rare.

Part of the problem is the widespread mentality—often within professors themselves—that “we are experts and therefore know what’s best for our students.” That need for autonomy, while understandable, is misplaced. We’re experts in the subject matter, so it makes sense we decide what to teach (i.e., the content of the course: the newest issues, what topics are most important, etc.). Yet we’re not experts at how to teach. At least most of us.

That’s why we need instructional support.

What if colleges and universities provided more training? Imagine if, for instance, if a history department hosted a workshop to teach the best ways to: 1) write a syllabus that students actually read; 2) increase student participation; 3) present engaging lectures; and 4) get students to “do the readings.” It would address common frustrations among instructors.

How about gathering junior faculty to observe a class taught by highly rated professors? In Japan, K-12 teachers use these “lesson studies” to analyze and dissect best practices. Teachers improve when they see how others teach. It has become so popular that many public school districts in the U.S. have embraced this professional development approach. It is time colleges and universities do the same.

Without better teachers, students suffer. Sociologists Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa, co-authors of Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses, argue that many students still can’t think critically, solve problems, or write effectively even after they graduate. Even worse, employers don’t think graduates are ready to compete in the workplace.

Of course, there are many reasons for this. For one, colleges and universities need to stop prioritizing institutional prestige over students’ education. That’s a larger issue for another time.

In the meantime, why not start small? Help professors become better teachers. Professional development is a great way to start.

  • I often hear that just because someone is an expert in a domain doesn’t mean they can teach it. I heard this mostly when I was in college, but many professors were still not given (or it seemed like they weren’t given) training on how to actually teach. One professor even had 150 slides, all filled with text, for every 2 hour lecture.

    This bleeds into other professions too. Folks are promoted to managers for doing their job well, but never given instruction on management. People become interviewers without training on how to actually conduct an interview.

    It seems like there is a perception that these “soft” skills are really easy and that a domain expert can just pick them up. I agree with your argument that it should be treated with as much discipline as the domain itself.

    • Your example of managers never never learning to manage especially resonated with me, as I know someone who has complained about this. They’re promoted for good work, but knowing how to lead others?

      I’m glad there is this emerging recognition in K-12 about socio-emotional skills–even though employers have been saying such soft skills are critical for a long time.

      BTW it makes me cry when I hear about 150 slides…

  • {"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}
    >